I support the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, and wish to make a point which goes to the heart of her concern. As I understand the point she was making, nutrition is what matters most early in a pregnancy. One of the most interesting things about the way in which the tax credits and benefits system has been going is that, because of its emphasis on child poverty, there is now developing—I shall try to draw this out in a later amendment—quite a distortion of the way in which the poor are supported.
If you are a lone parent with one child, according to the House of Commons Library, you are now running at only 4 per cent from the minimum poverty line. If you are a single woman—a potential mother or a pregnant individual—your income distance is now 22 per cent. What the noble Baroness is saying, as I understand it—I have great sympathy because we have been trying to make this point all the way through the debate on the causes of poverty—is that poverty and an inadequate diet around the period of conception or shortly afterwards have a causative effect on poor outcomes later. It could be argued that the way in which we are distorting our benefits system for the poor to help child poverty has a direct impact on such poor outcomes.
Child Poverty Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Freud
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c260GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:06:24 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614075
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614075
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614075