My Lords, I seek reassurance from the Minister on a point that the noble Lord, Lord Freud, raised with regard to a concern that we might be promoting income transfers as opposed to tackling the roots of poverty. One questions, for instance, whether one might be diverting money towards supporting families on benefits, as important as that is, which could be spent on ensuring that there are more and better-quality social workers. We could spend the money on ensuring that there are more foster carers, because the number that we have and retaining them are so dependent on the fact that they have good social workers to support them. Alternatively, we could spend the money on our teachers and ensure that there is better sex and relationship education in schools, thereby reducing the rates of teenage pregnancy and ensuring that families prosper and children are taken out of poverty in that way. I am sure that we will come back to this debate. However, I would be grateful if the Minister would offer reassurance that other important objectives will not be lost in the narrow pursuit of the important targets that we are discussing today.
Child Poverty Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Listowel
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c121-2GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:38:09 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610729
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610729
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610729