UK Parliament / Open data

Policing and Crime Bill

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that clarification on what constitutes information. That is reassuring. I also thank other noble Lords for their contributions to the discussion. Surely, the Minister and the Government are aware that quite a lot of unease remains about the workings of the extradition treaty and whether it represents reciprocity, putting it in simple layman's language. I raised a number of other points and perhaps I can have a conversation separately with the Minister about them. I offered to look at the drafting if the problem with my amendment was unintended effect; it was not intended to disable us fulfilling our obligations as laid down or to create a condition of prima facie evidence. I do not think that we need to be hung up on that. However, I suspect that I am not going to get any co-operation on drafting. In light of the discussion we have had and, perhaps, the inability to take this further, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 96 withdrawn. Amendment 96ZA Moved by
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
714 c476 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top