I am grateful for the opportunity to debate the Culture, Media and Sport Committee's report on the Licensing Act 2003. The Committee held a wide-ranging inquiry into the Act. We had four public evidence sessions and received a wide range of submissions, and I would like to put on record my thanks, and those of Committee members, to our staff and to our legal adviser, Sara John.
The principle of post-legislative scrutiny is a good one, and it would be helpful if more Acts could be looked at two or three years after their implementation to see whether the objectives set out when a Bill was first introduced have been achieved. No one could possibly argue with the objectives of the 2003 Act. The four licensing objectives clearly make common sense and the Act's intention, which was to streamline the process and make it easier to reduce costs, is one we all supported.
Licensing Act
Proceeding contribution from
John Whittingdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 22 October 2009.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Licensing Act.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
497 c311WH 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-05 22:30:08 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_587257
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_587257
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_587257