I am grateful to the Minister for being prepared to take away this first batch of amendments. It is an issue of constitutional legitimacy and not a question of objecting to the procedures. We can ponder on these things. It strikes me that they are mild amendments. On Amendment 160, will the Minister reflect on whether we need some means in which a college can try to short-circuit what have been long-winded procedures of one sort or another?
As I said, we will reflect. The Minister does not need to write to us further about the procedures. We have had masses of paper about how the YPLA will operate and we do not need the Bill team to write us yet another set of letters. We will ponder on it further, because the AOC is legitimately concerned. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 156 withdrawn.
Amendments 157 to 160 not moved.
Clause 65 agreed.
Clauses 66 to 69 agreed.
Amendment 161 not moved.
Clause 70 : Guidance by YPLA
Amendments 161A and 161B not moved.
Clause 70 agreed.
Clauses 71 and 72 agreed.
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Sharp of Guildford
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 October 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
713 c272 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:10:59 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584452
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584452
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_584452