On a technical point, the first part is correct—""shall be reduced by 2 per cent. for the tax year 2010-11","
but the amendment then reads""and by a further 2 per cent.""
If it said, "by 2 per cent. for subsequent years", I would understand that, but""by a further 2 per cent.""
indicates to me, if I have read it correctly, a reduction in the level of duty, rather than a stabilisation of it and the reversal of the escalator only.
Finance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Stewart Hosie
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 July 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
495 c929 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:42:31 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575554
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575554
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575554