At last it is becoming clearer in my confused mind, to which I referred earlier. I suspect that Amendment 169 depends on the draftsman. I know many draftsmen who would have used the word "section" at the beginning and drafted the rest of the clause slightly differently. Looking carefully at the clause, I see that it all refers to subsection (1), so in another draftsman’s mind, the word "subsection" would be perfectly appropriate.
On Amendment 167, I am extremely grateful to the Minister. I shall have to study carefully what he has said, including the additional information on which I pinned him down, and I will consider that before we reach the next stage. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 167 withdrawn.
Amendment 168 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.
Clause 34 agreed.
Clause 35 agreed.
Clause 36 : Pilot schemes
Amendment 169 not moved.
Clause 36 agreed.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 July 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c129GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:30:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_573603
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_573603
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_573603