Responding first to the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, it is inevitably the case, as my noble friend confirmed, that when having pathfinders and pilots it is not infrequent for there to be different financial arrangements in the pilots from the generality of benefits. As my noble friend says, we need a controlled situation to test the benefits of the arrangements that we are looking at. I stress that our pilots revolve around the benefit being conditional, not around inactivity being a choice.
I do not wish to raise my noble friend’s hopes on this. I reiterate that I am happy to reflect on it given the history and what was said in the Green Paper. However, I cannot promise to come back with an amendment that she would find satisfactory.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 June 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c350GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:41:28 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569105
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569105
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_569105