I cannot withdraw my amendment until I have understood the reason why I am being asked to do so. Let us set aside my parenthetical question about Clause 1, which I do not think impinges on this; I am happy simply to read what the Minister said before the next stage. On the amendment, though, I understood him to say that if we took out Clause 6(2) there would be no definition of the prescribed manner. That, however, is only on the assumption that we had not substituted the words in subsection (1) that I propose, which would make it clear. I do not follow his reasoning here. I may have misheard him, and maybe other noble Lords have heard him better than I have, but, for my own benefit, could he tell me slowly and clearly whether there is anything that he said, beyond what I have repeated, that I could possibly accept as a reason for withdrawing my amendment?
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Elton
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 June 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c1042-3 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:18:02 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_567666
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_567666
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_567666