The noble Lord is quite right; my terminology was wrong. Clause 1 is indeed about welfare to work, which, as we all know, involves contractors and, as I think we all know, subcontractors. Someone is going to have to monitor all this. As the contractors in the pilots will be localised—I have somewhere a list which the Minister helpfully told us on Thursday was on the DWP website—and in specific geographical areas, it is logical to assume, although no one has yet told me, that the monitoring will be done, in part anyway, by the jobcentres in those areas. This monitoring is on top of the work that they are already doing. Over and above that, of course, there is the movement from the current job adviser to the personal adviser, as I tried to explain. I am suspicious, if I may put it that way.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 June 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c193GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:24:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566584
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566584
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566584