I, too, support the amendment. I have tabled a later amendment in regard to people with fluctuating conditions and the training necessary to deal with them.
I was horrified to hear the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, say that there would be three days’ training. I told the Committee last week that I worked in the Ministry of Pensions 50 years ago. I had six weeks’ training, and things were much less complicated in those days. I therefore hope that the noble Lord is wrong.
I am particularly concerned about the over-50s. On Friday, there was a little article in the Telegraph which stated: ""White-collar professionals have been hit hard by the recession … the number of managers and professionals claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance jumped by 154 per cent"—"
I do not have dates— ""while for skilled trade workers the increase was 77 per cent"."
These are big numbers—118,700 managerial people and 589,000 skilled trade workers. That is a lot of people to cater for. The noble Lord’s correspondence of last week showed that advisers will spend a lot of time with each client, but how will jobcentres cater for these increases in unemployed professionals, let alone unskilled workers? I am very seriously concerned about that and I expressed these concerns at Second Reading.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Countess of Mar
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 June 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c186GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:40:17 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566568
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566568
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566568