UK Parliament / Open data

Light Dues

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Turner (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 2 June 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Light Dues.
I approve of what is happening on transparency—we are at least doing things openly—but I do not answer for what is happening in continental countries, whether or not it should be happening. Will the Minister set out a firm timetable for eliminating the Irish subsidy? He should suspend the proposed increases that are due to come into effect on 1 July pending the preparation of a new budget to reduce the administrative costs of the three general lighthouse authorities. The Independent Light Dues Forum, which represents major international shipping lines, other trade association bodies and individual shipping companies of all sizes have all urged such action. It is imperative that the Government act to remove the burden of this proposed tax increase on ships calling at British ports. In 1898, Sir Thomas Sutherland, the then Member for Greenock, said:""I am quite certain it passes the wit of man to devise any scheme for imposing those lighthouse dues which shall be absolutely equitable. It has never been done, and it never will be done."—[Official Report, 17 March 1898; Vol. 55, c. 170.]" I am more of an optimist—I do not believe that that is the case. Let this be the Minister's legacy: he could be the Minister who, after nearly two centuries of controversy, finally did right by the shipping companies and introduced a reform of light dues that is fair and equitable to our maritime industry.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
493 c4-5WH 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Back to top