Perhaps I may respond to the issue of how difficult it is to prove recklessness. That is quite properly so. I emphasised that the burden of proof must be to a criminal standard in this case. That is why we are opposed to the amendments. There is already a considerable burden on proving an offence under this provision to the standard required in the clause.
Political Parties and Elections Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Tunnicliffe
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c159GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:29:55 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552770
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552770
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552770