In view of what has been said, I support the second two amendments of the noble Lord, Lord Henley. Recklessness is a much more difficult thing to prove than whether somebody knew something or not. I suggest that recklessness is often in the eye of the beholder.
Secondly, Amendment 88, if carried, would certainly have avoided the problems to which I referred at Second Reading and in Committee yesterday of an innocent mistake ending up in court on appeal and even eventually going to the High Court at vast expense to the taxpayer and the recipient political party. I very much hope that the noble Lord, Lord Henley, will bring those last two back at the next stage.
Political Parties and Elections Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Pearson of Rannoch
(UK Independence Party)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c159GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:41:41 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552769
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552769
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552769