I support the amendment. It is absolutely right that if, in fact, the Electoral Commission has been asked to do a piece of work, that response must come. I am not sure whether six months is not a bit too long, but I shall go with the amendment. It is important that responses are received while the issue is still timely. If you leave it a year, you could have completely forgotten what the issue is about. To lay this down means that there has to be a response. The commission says that usually it does get responses, but there have been occasions when it has not. That is unacceptable. It is unfortunate, perhaps, if something needs to go into the Bill to say that that has to happen, but if that is necessary then so be it. The commission also makes the point that reports should be published under Sections 5 and 6 of PPERA. We should ensure that it covers all those points.
Political Parties and Elections Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Gould of Potternewton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c134-5GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:41:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552715
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552715
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552715