First, I should say how much I appreciate the fact that the Government have picked up the point that I made in Second Reading about the level of this flexibility for the chief executive. It is absolutely right that that should happen; I also think that it is right that they have to have that consultation with the Speaker’s Committee, which, at the end of the day, will no doubt be the body that takes the decision. I have no doubt that the chief executive will listen with care to whatever the Speaker’s Committee says. I wanted to make that point.
Having listened to the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, I want to make another point. I accept that if someone is in a politically sensitive post, obviously it might be important that there is a longer term. However, the clause states that in deciding what that period should be, the chief executive shall take account not only of the level of seniority of the post, but ""how likely it is that any holder of the post will be required to deal with politically sensitive matters"."
In fact, the clause covers the points that the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, made. Perhaps I may say again how grateful I am and, I am sure, how grateful the chief executive of the commission is that he will now have the flexibility to—
Political Parties and Elections Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Gould of Potternewton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c128GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:02:02 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552696
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552696
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552696