I shall not be moving the two other amendments in this group—Amendments 60B and 62—as I think that we discussed them to some extent yesterday. I apologise again to the Committee for the fact that I was unable to be present when my noble friend dealt with them. However, perhaps noble Lords will bear with me if I briefly touch on Amendment 60A, which I do not think need take up too much of the Committee’s time.
As the noble Lord will see, the amendment inserts "promptly" after the word "shall", so that the commission imposes a discretionary requirement on someone promptly. I hope that that is as simple and self-explanatory as possible. It stems from a desire to ensure that the commission demonstrates good practice if it hopes for similar good practice in return from those with whom it deals. Having said merely that, I would be grateful to hear what the Minister has to say. I beg to move.
Political Parties and Elections Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 April 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Political Parties and Elections Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c107GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:02:53 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552658
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552658
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_552658