Yes, the Conservatives are planning to go a little way towards it, but still not enough for some people.
The points that have been made are important, but it would be most unfortunate—I have had this view expressed to me by many Australians and I have discussed it with people at high level in the Australian Government, and I believe that the same would apply to all Commonwealth people—if our Government in the United Kingdom, and I look on it as "our" Government because I have lived here so long, suddenly said, "All Commonwealth people are unwelcome unless they suddenly become British". That would be a dramatic change from the marvellous tolerance that Britain has always had towards people from all parts of the Commonwealth. That is why this is called the mother country, because it has always been so welcoming and supportive. To turn around and say, "Sorry, you’re all out if you’re Commonwealth" would provoke a pretty bad reaction, not only in Australia but in pretty well all the Commonwealth. I return to the same point: domicile. If domicile were not in the Bill, I would have no objection to the taxation issue.
House of Lords (Members’ Taxation Status) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Gardner of Parkes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 12 March 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on House of Lords (Members' Taxation Status) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c1372 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:19:15 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_538290
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_538290
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_538290