UK Parliament / Open data

Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

The Minister was addressing the amendments I have tabled. I should remind him that the wording is, "““consult any relevant public authority or IFCA””." It is not a list. It is a matter of considering what is relevant to the application and whether it should be considered. It is specific. If IFCA ceased to exist, no doubt there would be legislation for a replacement body, which would replace its functions in previous legislation. It is nothing more than putting into the Bill what the Minister is saying—that licensing authorities would be consulted, because that is what they are about. They want to get it right. There is no list; it is just a matter of procedure. I am surprised the Minister is taking such a hostile view.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c89 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top