UK Parliament / Open data

Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

I do not know how the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, would respond to that, but I think that he would express gratitude to the Minister for establishing the precedents—this House likes its precedents. I still think that ““expedient”” in all other definitions, which have not been quoted by the Minister but which my noble friend referred to, has a deprecatory sense; that is even in the Oxford English Dictionary. ““Necessary””, ““desirable”” or ““appropriate”” might be more suitable here. The noble Lord is clearly trying to make this legally watertight—to coin a phrase—so that it will not be challenged. So be it; that is right. I suspect that ““expedient”” is just as likely to be challenged by some clever lawyer as the other words that we have referred to as possible alternatives. Nevertheless, this is, I am sure, not an issue on which we want to spend any more time. I therefore beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 101ZA withdrawn. Amendment 101ZB not moved. Clause 64 agreed.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c83 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top