UK Parliament / Open data

Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

I have long thought that those of us involved in politics should have a better training in psychology. I apply that to myself. I understand what the Minister is saying, but the difficulty is that the final decision on whether there should be an independent investigation lies with one side in this argument. That is why I object to it being a discretionary matter. I make one final comment: EIPs do not need to labour long and tediously over particular items. There is now a well worked-out process for sorting out procedure for pre-hearing work to reduce the amount of time spent in public and sort things out beforehand. I see no reason why that could not also apply in the case of a marine plan. I have spent long enough on this. I will consider what the Minister has had to say and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 89J withdrawn. Amendment 89JZA not moved. Amendment 89JZAA not moved.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c28 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top