My Lords, as far as I am concerned, Members of this House should pay full British taxes and that is an end to it.
This is a Second Reading debate, and we have had a good discussion of the principles. I have tried to keep it on principles and not personalities and there is an important issue here. I am disappointed by the Government’s reaction. They may not like the Bill—and I can understand that and that they might want to amend it—but I am disappointed that we are still hearing the argument that, because the Budget two years ago said that there would be no substantial change in the position of non-doms, that somehow stops a long overdue reform of this House, which would be minor in terms of the overall number of non-doms here and is almost a self-regulatory issue. I cannot see that that is a sensible excuse to hide behind, so I am disappointed. If the Government do believe in making these changes, I wish that they would get on with it. I would be happy to work with them, but I am disappointed at the tone, which seems to suggest kicking this into the long grass. I hope that as the Bill progresses we will move forward.
House of Lords (Members’ Taxation Status) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 23 January 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on House of Lords (Members' Taxation Status) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
706 c1874 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:47:48 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522335
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522335
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522335