There is some confusion between paragraph 28 of Schedule 1, which refers to the provision of account-type information to the Secretary of State, and Clause 27, which refers to general information. I think they both apply in different ways, and probably overlap. I was interested in the amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, and the Minister’s reply. It seems that what we now have on the record is a very satisfactory assurance of what will happen and how it will work in practice. The noble Lord, Lord Taylor, will have his own views on that in due course.
On my amendment, I heard what the Minister said. Clearly, ““functions”” refers to objectives. I do not quite understand why the Minister is opposing the idea that the Bill should say that there should be a report about the general objectives. This would particularly be the case if the wishes of some of us—expressed in later amendments—to expand those general objectives came about. For the moment, I certainly beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 14 withdrawn.
Amendment 15 not moved.
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Greaves
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 January 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
706 c1072-3 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:48:20 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517598
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517598
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517598