I am slightly worried about advertising because evidence from the United States is mixed. For example, the ““Scared Straight”” programme, which showed young people the consequences of their actions, appeared to lead to an increase in crime. It appears to make a genuine difference when the person at risk is emotionally engaged with the consequences of a potential action. Such consequences do not necessarily emerge from advertising. What evidence can the Minister give the House to show that generalised advertising programmes, which do not necessarily have the emotional impact of a restorative justice programme, will lead to a reduction in crime?
Fighting Crime (Public Engagement)
Proceeding contribution from
Chris Huhne
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 6 November 2008.
It occurred during Debate on Fighting Crime (Public Engagement).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
482 c406 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:28:34 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506605
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506605
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506605