I thank the noble Baroness for that answer. It is important that there is transparency right from the beginning about the CQC’s funding and the way in which that funding relates to its functions, objectives and priorities. I hear what the noble Baroness says about the notification process. However, I say again that there is a huge difference between an acute hospital and a small domiciliary care scheme. We are talking about a system that must cover both and be proportionate to both. However, with that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 16 agreed to.
Clause 17 agreed to.
[Amendment No. 55 not moved.]
Clause 18 [Consultation etc. in relation to code of practice under s.17]:
[Amendment No. 55A not moved.]
Clause 18 agreed to.
Clause 19 [Guidance as to compliance with requirements]:
[Amendment No. 56 not moved.]
Clause 19 agreed to.
Clauses 20 to 24 agreed to.
Health and Social Care Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Barker
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 May 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health and Social Care Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
701 c166GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:35:53 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_469318
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_469318
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_469318