Before my hon. Friend moves off that point, may I say that I do not think that anyone would accuse the hon. Member for Preseli Pembrokeshire of trying to mess around in the Bill? He is acting from the noblest of motives. We talk about inherent characteristics, but our problem is that, as in the case of the Burmese elephant and the then entitled ““midget””, this is about the strength of the animal and its ability rather than its characteristics. A famous sign in the Paris zoo translates into English as, ““This animal is very bad. When it is attacked, it defends itself.”” Surely every single animal has within it the ability or characteristic in certain circumstances to act in a way that would define it as dangerous.
Animals Act 1971 (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Pound
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 14 March 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animals Act 1971 (Amendment) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c584 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:06:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_455528
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_455528
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_455528