I am sure that the whole House is grateful for that information, which will come as a considerable surprise to the leader writers of the Daily Mail.
Does my hon. Friend think that the reason why the specialist legal practitioners who responded to the DEFRA consultation that took place 18 months ago concluded that Mirvahedy v. Henley created a satisfactory situation is relevant to the point that he has just made?
Animals Act 1971 (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Pound
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 14 March 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animals Act 1971 (Amendment) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c581-2
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:22:36 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_455524
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_455524
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_455524