UK Parliament / Open data

Animals Act 1971 (Amendment) Bill

The hon. Gentleman seems content with the law as it has been since the case of Mirvahedy. Yet in the case mentioned by the hon. Member for Ealing, North, the victim was not compensated because the law was not sufficient to provide the protection. The law is unclear; that is the whole point of this discussion. We are not talking about claims that go along the negligence route, but about where strict liability does and does not apply.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c553 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top