I think the Minister will find that this is a warm-up to further debates we will have today, on another day in Committee and on Report so that we can finally resolve this question. In their paper the Government put forward two options: option A, which is the Bill, and option B, which is, in effect, what is proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Lester of Herne Hill. There is also option C, which was put forward by my noble friend Lord Campbell, to strike out the clause on the basis that there is no obligation to follow the decision of the European Court of Human Rights because the judgment is not binding.
We want to hear the Minister’s response to my noble friend’s amendment. We will then want to listen to what the noble Lord, Lord Lester, has to say about his amendment in which he puts forward what is, in effect, option B. Obviously at a later stage the House will have to make a decision about the correct approach.
Employment Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 13 March 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c303-4GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:32:00 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454876
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454876
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454876