UK Parliament / Open data

European Union (Amendment) Bill

I am interested in the Minister's use of semantics. If he is saying that the present wording is effectively the same as that of amendment No. 47—because an abstention would have that effect—what is his objection to the amendment, if it is seen to be written in clearer language?
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c1669 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top