I make it clear that of course I was not suggesting that because the Prime Minister is discussing the matter today that it is outside our ambit to discuss this at all. I was suggesting that no one knows what will happen in the negotiations between the Prime Minister and the trade union movement. We do not yet know whether the point the noble Lord, Lord Wedderburn, made, as reflected in the amendment, will be agreed by the Government. We are asking the Minister to make a comment on the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Wedderburn, before he knows the result of the negotiations between the Prime Minister and the trade union movement. Therefore, in order to expedite the passage of this Bill, would it not be better to postpone the debate until Report, when we will know better what has occurred at Downing Street today? That is all I was suggesting.
Employment Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Razzall
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 February 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c87GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:32:15 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447978
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447978
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447978