With leave, I wish to make a personal statement of apology to the Committee about the way in which the noble Baroness, Lady Turner, and I left our position on Clause 4 on 4 February. On reading Hansard, we realised that we had left a false impression, which should be put right before Report. My noble friend and I believe that Clause 4 is not compatible with Article 6 of the European convention, which accords to everyone the right to a fair and public hearing before an independent tribunal, which pronounces judgment publicly. That is made worse by the fact that the European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment given by 13 judges against five dissentients on 13 November 2007, in the case of DH v Czech Republic, restated the court’s interpretation of the law—especially in respect of waiver of convention rights. We intend to take that position further on Report. I have already written to the Minister. I apologise again for our failure to make that clear to the Committee in our earlier proceedings.
Clause 5 [Conciliation before bringing of proceedings]:
Employment Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 February 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c65GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:36:57 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447943
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447943
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447943