I absolutely take the point, but I refer to new paragraph (b), which states: "““the offence, or the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it, was so serious that, notwithstanding the age of the offender””,"
an order under subsection (3)(a) or (b), "““cannot be justified for the offence””."
Does that not cover the objection to which the noble Lord reasonably referred?
Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Onslow
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 February 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c995
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:29:34 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443242
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443242
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443242