That is a fair point. When an employment Bill comes forward, people take the opportunity to get into it items that are perhaps not otherwise covered. I accept the argument that these amendments do not necessarily logically fit into these provisions in the Bill. Nevertheless, we feel that these are important issues. This amendment is trying to get at the point that quite often when someone is at home because he is involved in a grievance or disciplinary procedure because he has not come to work, it is because some form of bullying in the workplace has made him stay at home. We have no pride of drafting in this amendment, but we think an obligation should be put on an employer that when an employee has stayed at home, and as a result may be involved in some form of disciplinary or grievance procedure, there should be an obligation on the employer to carry out a risk assessment. This is not necessarily the logical place to put this in the Bill, but when we are faced with the 28th piece of employment legislation since 1997, we want to seize the opportunity to add little bits when we think they might be useful.
Employment Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Razzall
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 February 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c474GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:29:02 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442127
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442127
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442127