Before the Minister concludes, I have been listening with great interest. He has not really dealt with the substance of the point raised in the amendment, but the procedure through which it might be dealt. Can he go back to the substance? I know he is advising us that this is not the place, but he referred to the code as already having provisions dealing with surveillance and monitoring. It might be of great assistance to the Committee if he could indicate his own judgment on that bit of the code that already exists, and whether it could be built on without all the bureaucratic and administrative problems that he outlined in his deregulatory approach. Is the code currently sufficient? Could it be improved in some way? If he told us, we could deal with this matter now rather than leaving it for another day.
Employment Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hunt of Wirral
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 February 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c462GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:33:04 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442077
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442077
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442077