I do not have to write to the noble Lord; I shall answer him now. I have the finest brains in Whitehall drafting my notes. The term ““composite hereditament””, which he read out, is already covered by ““domestic premises””, as used in the schedule, so a separate category of composite hereditament is unnecessary. It means that ““domestic waste”” covers the element of waste collected from a composite hereditament, which means waste from domestic premises as opposed to commercial industrial waste, so the corner shop would get its domestic waste collected. That answers the noble Lord’s whole question, which is why I thought I could dispose of this quite quickly.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rooker
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 January 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c681 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:41:48 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441406
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441406
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441406