I listened carefully when my hon. Friend said that he was considering voting for the Conservative amendment. However, although it is better than the substantive motion, might it not be best to go back to square one? All the flaws that he mentions in the context of the charter also apply to other subjects that are being missed out of the debate. Would it not be a cleaner decision to vote against the substantive motion?
Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty)
Proceeding contribution from
Graham Stringer
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 28 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
471 c78 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:28:54 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439466
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439466
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439466