I have noted that the wording has been changed from that which was considered previously, but I am still puzzled. I had thought that this was now partly covered by paragraph 5(4), but in the light of what has been said I am not entirely clear what is the intention of the wording: "““The regulations may not provide for allowances to be allocated in return for consideration””."
Does that not cover auctioning? I am not clear. The Minister may say that it is not the regulations that will provide for it and that it will be dealt with in the Finance Bill. All I am saying is that where we have a clear recommendation from the Joint Committee and a change is made, it is useful to have a clear explanation from the Minister about what change has been made and why, so that people reading the original report and looking at the Bill again can see where we are. I confess that I was confused. I still am, a bit.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Crickhowell
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c245-6 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-11 17:47:29 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_438260
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_438260
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_438260