I will defend my drafting in one respect at least. I grant the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, his point that I should perhaps have said something about the LBRO’s ““relevant functions”” in drafting the amendment. That is clearly what I had in mind and what I think the noble Lord, Lord Haskins, had in mind on that occasion. On ““must give advice”” rather than ““may””, I was following the precedent of Clause 9(2), which concerns advice to a Minister, rather than Clause 9(1), which concerns advice that the LBRO chooses to give.
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Cope of Berkeley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c129GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:36:50 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437726
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437726
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437726