I understand the thrust of what the noble Lord is saying but I was interested in his comment that hundreds of local authorities cannot be monitored effectively by central government. If you are one of those local authorities, you feel that you are being monitored by central government, if not effectively. But in this context we are talking about monitoring by a single organisation—the LBRO. I am rather unhappy about what I interpret as applying an extra layer of bureaucracy. I believe that we have managed to get to 11 minutes past seven without using that term, which is quite extraordinary. This would mean another stage in the control. Each local authority will have guidance in any event. This would be an additional stage which would probably be too much for the local authority in practical terms and perhaps too much for the LBRO as well; it would certainly add to costs. So, reluctantly, I part company with the noble Lord on this one.
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hamwee
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c49-50GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:33:07 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436861
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436861
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436861