moved Amendment No. 24:
24: Clause 5, page 3, line 36, at end insert—
““(c) regulatory activities should be carried out on the basis of a risk assessment of the regulated person which should include that person’s propensity to comply with a regulation””
The noble Lord said: Crucial to the Hampton approach to enforcement is the concept that the aim should be to secure compliance rather than to seek prosecution. That activity should be focused on those who are most likely to disregard the law and fail to take remedial measures voluntarily. For this, it is essential that the emphasis of enforcement should be on those assessed as those who are likely to break the law and it seems strange that this key requirement should have been omitted, so this amendment seeks to achieve it. I beg to move.
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord De Mauley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c44GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:28:46 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436848
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436848
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_436848