I strongly support my noble friend’s amendment for the reasons that I indicated when I spoke briefly in the previous discussion on the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Teverson. It seems extremely important to spell out a strategy on how these matters are to be dealt with. I am pretty confident that the Minister, in response to the suggestion of the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, will say, ““That is absolutely nothing to do with us in this House or with the Government; it is a matter that will be decided by the other place””.
As for whether there will be a separate committee, I would have thought, given my experience of working, for example, on the European Union Committee’s sub-committee on foreign affairs and defence, that if a strategy paper were to be presented to Parliament, it would not be lost as a single item to be dealt with in a great batch. An appropriate House of Lords committee would almost certainly decide that it was exactly the kind of topic on which it should devote a day to cross-examining witnesses. Without going down the road of inventing parliamentary procedure, a matter which is not for us, my noble friend’s amendment would by its very nature produce exactly the kind of examination that the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, wants.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Crickhowell
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 January 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c774 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 02:01:22 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432258
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432258
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432258