I thank the noble Lord. I did not for one moment think that he did think that, but I felt it necessary to raise the point.
I urge the noble Baroness, when she reconsiders this matter before Report, to push the figure up from 30 per cent to 40 per cent. I believe that there has to be such a figure. I am grateful to the Front Bench for supplying us with briefing paper 5, page 2 of which reads: "““The Kyoto Protocol allows countries to use international emissions trading mechanisms to help meet their targets, provided that this is ‘supplemental’ to domestic action to reduce emissions (which must constitute a ‘significant element’ of the action taken by developed countries)””."
I wish that I could trust words such as ““supplemental”” and ““significant””, but life has taught me that I cannot. That is the reason—certainly from my perspective—for insisting on a figure being in the Bill. I would rather that it was 30 per cent but I shall settle for 40 if that is what it needs to get this amendment through this House. I shall support that situation at Report.
Climate Change Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Puttnam
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c523 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:59:50 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430941
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430941
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430941