UK Parliament / Open data

Finance Bill

It is interesting that the Minister raises that point, because the Government effectively reintroduced the relief in their A-day reforms for pension term assurance and they are now seeking to abolish it. What I aim to achieve this afternoon is to understand rather more about the Government’s thinking on that matter, particularly why they felt it appropriate to introduce this tax relief in 2004, when they want to remove it 2007. That is the purpose of my remarks today. What the introduction of pension term assurance enabled in the 2004 Finance Bill was the creation of a level playing field, so that the indirect tax relief that we receive through our contributions to pension schemes, which gives us death-in-service benefits, is also available to others who are in a less fortunate position than us. It is worth reflecting on the debate that took place on the 2004 Finance Bill. The right hon. Member for Bolton, West (Ruth Kelly), who was then Financial Secretary to the Treasury, said in the Standing Committee debate:"““Simplification will introduce greater individual choice and flexibility.””" She continued—this is the key quote—by saying:"““For the first time, everyone will have the same opportunity to make tax-relieved pension savings over a lifetime.””—[Official Report, Standing Committee A, 8 June 2004; c. 427.]" She referred to the creation of a level playing field.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c1387 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Back to top