Digital Switchover (Disclosure of Information) Bill

There has been the most serious consideration of where the balance should be struck on what we recognise is a difficult issue. After serious consideration in the Department and in the other place, and very serious consideration when I responded in terms of principle a few moments ago, I have been invited to change my mind. I have not done so. I recognise that the noble Lord holds no responsibility for any previous legislation. I have been unable to go back to 1916 or earlier for my illustration, but I have given the noble Lord, Lord Howard of Rising, a reference to legislation passed in 1992 was before this Administration came into power. Exactly the same concept was employed with regard to an Act of Parliament on social security. Others, besides me and my colleagues, fought through these issues and reached the same judgment on where the balance should be struck with regard to the offence. I have not changed my mind, despite the blandishments of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, who tried his hardest to win me over five minutes after I had rejected the concept. He has not succeeded, and I hope that he will withdraw his amendment.