I agree with the hon. Gentleman’s plea for transparency. First, we need information. I also agree with the hon. Gentleman that the initial figures—the £15 billion to which reference has been made—were bogus figures, and designed to be misleading.
We need to understand what the costs would be. We have asked the Government to consider seriously the possibility of using unclaimed assets as a way of supporting the group of people concerned. So far I have not seen any response to that suggestion. The Secretary of State, for reasons of high moral principle and a pragmatic need to achieve delivery and acceptance of his White Paper package, must look at the issue again. I believe that I speak on behalf of Members from all parts of the House in saying that if he decided to revise his position and take a more generous approach he would not be criticised in any quarter of the House.
Pensions Reform
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hammond of Runnymede
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 27 June 2006.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Pensions Reform.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c155 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:55:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333250
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333250
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333250