As I indicated earlier, it is not a strict liability offence. It is the responsibility of the prosecution to show that the individual had an article in his possession with an intention that it should be used in some fraud. That is not on the face of the Bill, but the provisions import the case law of Elan from the previous legislation. That is clear. I say it with all the authority that a Minister has on presenting a Bill. It is intended that the provision should import previous case law.
Fraud Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Mike O'Brien
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Fraud Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c559 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:16:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329243
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329243
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329243