UK Parliament / Open data

Fraud Bill [Lords]

Proceeding contribution from Mike O'Brien (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Fraud Bill [HL].
The hon. Gentleman referred to the Rose Committee. Let me refer him to the letter from Sir Christopher Rose, representing the views of senior judges. It stated:"““We said that it would be risky to repeal common law conspiracy to defraud, as it can be the most effective charge in a case where multiple defendants are engaged in a fraudulent course of conduct. There are limitations on the law of statutory conspiracy, which has had something of a chequered history. All the judges present at the meeting agreed the Bill should not repeal common law conspiracy to defraud.””" That is not an example of the Government deciding not to do something but of the Government listening. We have listened to the consultation.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c548 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top