I thank the Minister for her reply and explanation of why the Royal Pharmaceutical Society inspectorate is not mentioned in this part. I am grateful to her for explaining how the lead agency system will operate.
The instances where it may be necessary to enter someone’s home may well be rare, but this is quite an important issue of principle. No doubt, routine inspections will be unproblematic. There is no problem where someone is perfectly happy to let an authorised person in, but if they are unhappy about doing so, what happens? In such cases, it should be a matter for the police or the Royal Pharmaceutical Society inspectorate. I would have a job arguing that anyone else should have the legal right to insist on entry.
I shall reflect on this between now and Report, and consider what the noble Baroness has said. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c101GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:31:54 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324798
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324798
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324798