UK Parliament / Open data

Identity Cards Bill

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendments be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to."      COMMONS AMENDMENTS" [The page and line references are to Bill 28 as first printed for the Commons.] MOTION A 16 Clause 5, page 4, line 44, leave out ““must”” and insert ““may, if the individual so chooses,”” 22 Clause 8, page 7, line 42, leave out ““must”” and insert ““may, if the individual so chooses,”” The Commons disagree to these amendments for the following reason— 22A Because the Commons consider it appropriate that a person applying for a designated document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an ID Card issued to him The Lords insist on their Amendments Nos. 16 and 22 for the following reason— 22B Because the Lords consider it inappropriate that a person applying for a designated document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an ID Card issued to him The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendments Nos. 16 and 22 but propose Amendment No. 22C in lieu 22C Page 4, line 45, after ““include”” insert ““or be accompanied by””
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c1223 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top